Who influences their identity in this digital world?

As a digital learning facilitator in a bilingual international primary school, I’m noticing how much AI is used outside school that we don’t always see.

In Year 4, I put the students in a circle and give them a piece of string to hold. The string is the internet. I create a picture of a child their age. In the scenario, a student takes a picture of a friend at a sleepover or a play date and shares it in a private message without asking. I give a copy to the student next to them, and they share it with the next student and the next student. Before long, everyone has a copy.

I mention it to them, a parent complains, and the student is told to delete the picture. I take a pair of scissors and cut the string on both sides of the student who originally shared it. They’re disconnected. All the other pictures are still out there. What happens to the copies other people already have? We talk about our responsibility when we take a picture and when we decide to share it. Someone once told me, “The internet is written in ink, not pencil.”

I use Your Rings of Responsibility from Common Sense Education across primary and adapt it for their age. It’s a helpful entry point for talking about responsibility online and identity within a family, school and community.

Sometimes it’s a child hearing a parent ask Alexa a question or seeing someone interact with a chatbot at the dinner table. Sometimes it’s an AI toy that talks back. And sometimes it’s the children themselves coming across AI in a game they already play.

How do young children think their identity is formed in this context? Who influences their identity? Hearing how teenagers talk about AI in Dr. Emily Weinstein’s work at Nearfield Listening Lab made me think about my own work with younger children.

In Year 5, we focus on trust using Mike Caulfield’s SIFT method in a Common Sense Education lesson. As students start their research and look at AI summaries, we pause, think and check other voices and sources. How do we decide if we can trust what we’re reading?

In Year 6, we come back to the rings and focus on digital reputation. We start with what they know at school. There’s a school email. You have a class Chromebook. You’re associated with a teacher. Then we talk about where they go outside school, like YouTube, Minecraft or Roblox.

We use My Digital Reputation Map. It puts you in the middle, with three circles around you. I ask the students to think about what they control and what they might not see.

  1. People you choose. Who do you choose to connect with or share with, like friends and family?
  2. People who see you by accident. Who might see you when someone tags you, shares something or takes a screenshot?
  3. Who gains from seeing you? We talk about apps, games and advertisers, and things we don’t always see, like algorithms and tracking.

I talk about Spotify and TikTok, and they talk about YouTube. I ask where they might be experiencing tracking. YouTube usually comes up, along with their game consoles and sometimes Netflix. We talk about how what they’ve watched can influence what gets suggested next.

On five or six Post-its, the children write down what they think influences who they are based on the three rings we talked about. Family is so often the biggest connection. Then you notice friends, the apps they’re on, the companies, the games they play and the videos they watch. Some start talking about AI too, from talking to Alexa to coming across a chatbot in a game.

What I am slowly witnessing is how early children start to make these connections themselves. They’re being exposed to AI early, and it’s often harder to see. What’s the difference between talking to a person and interacting with an AI that seems like it has feelings and empathy? How do they tell the difference, especially when it feels like they’re being listened to?

In Year 6, I ask, “Who gains from seeing you?” When we talk about AI, there’s another question I want students to ask themselves. What do I think before I ask AI for help?

It can be frustrating when we ask students to stay with a question a little longer. But that’s where they get to think things through for themselves and decide when they need help. I think that’s why starting young is so important. We build those habits in small bits and pieces throughout primary school.

Sources

Participating in a conversation on: Leading Technology When You Don’t Hold the Keys: Lessons from Seven International School Technology Leaders

I joined six other guests, including IT Directors, School Directors and Digital Learning Facilitators, in a conversation hosted by https://www.21c-learning.com/ exploring what it means when you are responsible for the technology in a school and managing a team, but often do not have full autonomy in the decisions that need to be made.

In many cases, you need to work closely with leadership to move things forward. Sometimes this role is not regularly at the leadership table. In other cases, you are part of that team and need to be able to translate the needs and strategy of the school into what the context requires from the IT Director.

A big part of this is helping people understand the why and the how, especially when not everyone is clear on the decisions that need to be made.

Find the article about the conversation: Leading Technology When You Don’t Hold the Keys: Lessons from Seven International School Technology Leaders written by Justin Hardman CEO & Founder (21c-Learning)

Image by: Zoya Yasmine / https://betterimagesofai.org / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Digital Fluency, Metacognition and AI

I had the pleasure of sitting with Samuel Holsten from BrainTools at School podcast and share some reflections and thoughts on teaching, coaching and facilitating workshops and session focused on Digital and AI literacy and what it might mean in a school context today and why the answer has more to do with metacognition, ethics, and resilience than with any particular tool.

Recalibrating Truth: The essential role of media literacy in the curriculum

I had the pleasure of joining The International Schools Network event What is True: The Essential Role of Media Literacy in Schools. It was an honour to be part of a thoughtful panel discussion exploring how schools can navigate the growing challenges of misinformation, disinformation, and deep fakes in our daily digital lives. I was invited to open the session with a short keynote, sharing some of the key tensions we face as educators in helping students make sense of an increasingly complex media landscape.

Exploring AI’s Impact on Education: Opportunities and Ethical Dilemmas

Periodically, I have the privilege of facilitating conversations with the #ISLECISLoft, hosted by Nancy Lhoest-Squicciarini. A topic at the forefront of discussions with educators and school leaders is the growing prominence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and their impact on reshaping learning. The opportunities and challenges of this technology are complex and nuanced.

AI brings many questions to the table, particularly as we explore the value-added proposition of schools when such powerful tools are accessible 24/7 at home and in classrooms. Within this context, the issues of bias, racism, and the ethical dilemmas these tools raise challenge our beliefs and values.

A real pleasure to have this conversation with Ken Shelton and Dee Lanier, authors of The Promises and Perils of AI in Education: Ethics and Equity Have Entered The Chat . Enjoy !

Adaptability Quotient (AQ): Navigating “Predictable unpredictability,” 

There is no doubt that a growing, shared realization exists, however challenging it might be at times, that we are transitioning to an era of “Predictable unpredictability,” as quoted in The Economist.  2023 came with a whirlwind of changes, at a pace and magnitude that feels somewhat overwhelming. The sobering truths of climate change have become too frequent a reality for many. The rapid integration and prevalence of artificial intelligence in our lives comes with a mix of fear and excitement. In addition the ongoing geopolitics conflicts we witness have the realities of war on many peoples doorsteps.

Each of these factors affects us uniquely within our respective contexts, each with its distinctive complexities. These accelerated changes are reshaping the realities we have grown accustomed to using as reference points for our own understanding of the world around us. With these changes come new questions and awareness that at times seem daunting. 

Photo John Mikton Bois du Nant Switzeralnd

International Schools in general possess the ability to insulate themselves from a certain degree to the changes surrounding them—I refer to this as a “walled garden.” This process  is purposeful and occurs gradually and cautiously, with the intention of providing a caring and age-appropriate set of learning experiences and pathways. The objective and design are centered around supporting students in navigating the multitude of changes from the world they live in both at home and school in a safe and nurturing environment. International Schools curate these learning journeys, choreographing learning pathways that progressively develop, and create connections aligned with a curriculum and educational principles. This process requires patience, is delicate, intricate, and nuanced. 

We all agree in principle as educators, and believe that the capacity to adapt to different situations and problems is vital for managing and navigating life’s challenges. Understanding this, it’s important for us to reflect on how we react when confronted with such rapid changes, especially when we lack control or have minimal influence over the timing or consequences. The growing necessity to be in a constant flux of adaptability is challenging and at times exhausting. We are in a new narrative where we have to readjust our established understandings. Change disrupts the routines and habits we find comfort in—routines which provide us with stability, continuity, and familiarity. All important for our sense of purpose. 

If “Predictable unpredictability,” creates a break from our routines and becomes the new normal, the capacity to adapt will only be amplified as a critical mindset for International Schools to flourish by. This is where the concept of Adaptability Quotient (AQ)  (also often referred to as adaptability intelligence) – becomes important for International Schools and educators to harness .  

Robert J. Sternberg,  psychology professor at Cornell University, defines adaptive intelligence as  “the intelligence one needs to adapt to current problems and to anticipate future problems of real-world environments.” Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 823; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120823

The mindsets associated with AQ revolve on identifying what is relevant, and being comfortable forgetting past knowledge, adjusting to change in real time and being comfortable challenging habits and beliefs. With this an agility to adapt at short notice, always learning and listening with empathy to the different viewpoints of others. 

When International Schools engage with AQ, a challenge lies in the perception of an underlying culture of resistance to change. Change is often perceived as a threat to current and past methods and habits, destabilizing the status quo and eroding the sense of continuity and comfort. 

Changing how schools work, by adjusting and redesigning a curriculum to be flexible and agile to go along with AQ’s ideas, is a big step and a hurdle as we have limited points of reference to address many of the issues and complexities the world is facing mid and long term. The process of these changes require trust and empathy from all involved . This means schools need to design professional development that embraces “unlearning and relearning” and accepts that many of the things we learned and got used to are not always so helpful, even though they brought  a sense of stability and continuity. 

Engaging with the AQ requires an agility to balance new approaches with current approaches and workload. Ensuring we facilitate an iterative process in all school  strategic planning. Finding time to pause – reflect and to internalize the balance between developing new skills and maintaining current skills. 

When one thinks of the many mission statements, and learning principles highlighted by International Schools – such as flexibility, curiosity, innovator, resilience, and being a risk-taker – the notion of engaging with the Adaptability Quotient (AQ) makes sense. The shift is to embrace the idea of not teaching to the past, and accepting “predictable unpredictability” as our point of reference.

This academic year let us invite ourselves to:

“Become a student of change, it is the only thing that will remain constant.” Anthony J.D Angelo Founder of Collegiate Empowerment  & Author

John@beyonddigital.org

Anthony J.D Angelo Founder of Collegiate Empowerment  & Author 

Works referenced

“The new normal is already here. Get used to it.” The Economist, 18 December 2021, https://www.economist.com/leaders/2021/12/18/the-new-normal-is-already-here-get-used-to-it

Sternberg, Robert J. “Adaptive Intelligence: Its Nature and Implications for Education.” MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/12/823.

Saucier, Tracy. “Adaptability Quotient in Schools: AQ Is the New IQ.” Summerfield Waldorf Schools, 14 April 2022, https://summerfieldwaldorf.org/adaptability-quotient-in-International International Schoolss/. 

“Five Brain Leadership – Dr. Carlos Davidovich MD. EMCC.” Coaching y Neuromanagement, https://www.carlosdavidovich.com/en/five-leaders-eng/.

O’Brien, Brendan. “Leadership and Adaptability Quotient (AQ): Moving from EQ to AQ.” Creative Thinking Institute, https://creativethinkinginstitute.com/blog/leadership-and-adaptability-quotient-aq-moving-from-eq-to-aq/. 

Adaptability Quotient (AQ)

Reflecting on the Adaptability Quotient (AQ): To stay pertinent amidst today’s “predictable unpredictability,” I recognize that as an educator, I must present learners with genuine chances to grasp and use concepts across various disciplines, mediums, and settings. I’ve learned that nurturing adaptability, fostering critical thinking, and encouraging problem-solving skills are essential. It’s not always about finding clear solutions but often about engaging with fragmented opportunities within a backdrop of consistent unpredictability. This journey has highlighted the importance of an adaptability-focused mindset, and here, I delve into some of these key ideas and methods.

Thank you to Carlos Davidovich for his mentorship and many conversation exploring together this in a school context

Cybersecurity for International Schools

Cybersecurity is a multifaceted and complex issue, particularly in today’s world where a significant portion of our time, information, and lives are tied to digital devices, both for personal and professional purposes. It is increasingly crucial to possess a basic understanding and knowledge of securing one’s devices and managing digital security. For schools, the stakes are particularly high, and developing a solid cybersecurity plan is a critical aspect of managing the risks associated with digital devices in this day and age.

Recently, Dan Taylor, the host of the #internationalschoolpodcast, and I, the co-host, had an opportunity to discuss cybersecurity in schools, with a particular emphasis on international schools. Both of us have a keen interest in this subject, and Dan has been actively supporting international schools with Google Education Workspace’s robust security tools and processes. He has a genuine passion for this topic and has been doing a lot of work in this area. Meanwhile, I have facilitated workshops for parents, created videos and educator sessions, and worked with groups that provide one-on-one support and workshops to seniors focused on navigating digital ecosystems and devices.

In our discussion, Dan prepared an excellent slide presentation for the ECIS Leadership Conference, which he used to facilitate workshops for school leaders. We took the opportunity to share our perspectives and experiences, offering tips and strategies for school leaders to consider. Podcast version also available here

Leading Technological Change- a collaboration with Adam Morris

Over the years working in different international schools as an IT Director, Director eLearning, Head of Education and Media Technology and Deputy Principal I have had the opportunity to lead, design and collaborate with Leadership Teams and IT Teams the implementation and adoption of digital ecosystems and environments. These experiences have been an important point of reference in my own learning and understanding on the complexities, challenges and opportunities of leading technology change in a international school setting.

I had the privilege to be able to collaborate and co-write this eGuide with Adam Morris who is Schools Technology & Integrations Director @ FariaOne Group. A special thank you goes out to the Managebac team who provided us with support and guidance throughout the process. As the group worked and collaborated together on the eGuide Adam and I had the opportunity to each reference our own professional experiences working, coaching and supporting schools around the world with leading technology change.

The guide is a a point of reference to support conversations, reflections and how to engage with technology change with a whole school approach. It is there to provide provocations, points of reference on change and the workflows and dispositions to consider as one engages in a technology change process with a whole school approach https://guide.fariaedu.com/leading-technology-

change/

“Behavior Surplus” reflecting on digital balance.

I had the privilege to share some of my own reflections on digital devices, “behavior surplus” and balancing digital consumption with @DelanoMagazine podcast Newsmakers: podcast: spoti.fi/3Dq8IzP and article

l